
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.清华大学 中国农村研究院,北京 100084
2.清华大学 公共管理学院,北京 100084
3.南京财经大学 经济学院,江苏 南京 210023
4.中国社会科学院 农村发展研究所,北京 100732
Received:12 April 2024,
Revised:2024-04-25,
Published:30 September 2024
移动端阅览
曹丹丘,刘余,胡凌啸.农村土地调整的实现逻辑及影响因素——基于D村民小组的田野调查 [J]. 山西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,23(5):53⁃64.
CAO Danqiu,LIU Yu,HU Lingxiao.Implementation logic and influencing factors of rural land reallocation: a field investigation based on the D village group [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University(Social Science Edition),2024,23(5):53⁃64.
曹丹丘,刘余,胡凌啸.农村土地调整的实现逻辑及影响因素——基于D村民小组的田野调查 [J]. 山西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,23(5):53⁃64. DOI: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-816X.2024.05.006.
CAO Danqiu,LIU Yu,HU Lingxiao.Implementation logic and influencing factors of rural land reallocation: a field investigation based on the D village group [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University(Social Science Edition),2024,23(5):53⁃64. DOI: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-816X.2024.05.006.
以公共池塘资源治理为视角,借助制度分析与发展框架,通过一个村组的案例,采用理论分析法和案例分析法,探讨土地调整的内在逻辑和影响因素。研究发现,土地调整具有复杂的发生逻辑,单一因素难以决定其实现,而是多种因素的互动作用结果;村庄的自然物质条件、社会经济条件和通用制度规则等外部变量通过影响土地调整的交易成本,影响了土地调整的选择。在土地调整的过程中,土地调整的参与者数量越少,越容易达成决策和实践的统一。另外,调地传统为土地调整提供了非正式的制度依据,促成了土地调整的实现。研究结果展现了土地调整的成因与过程,提供了来自试点地区土地调整的经验证据,为理解农村的土地调整问题和二轮延包工作的顺利开展提供参考。
From the public pond resource management perspective, this study explores the internal logic and influencing factors of land reallocation with theoretical analysis and a case study of a village group under the institutional analysis and development framework. It finds that land reallocation has a complex causal logic, and it is hardly possible for a single factor to determine its realization; rather, it is the result of the interaction of multiple factors. External variables, such as the natural conditions, socio-economic conditions, and general institutional rules of the village affect the transaction costs of land reallocation, thereby influencing its choice. During the land reallocation process, the fewer participants there are, the easier it is to achieve unity in decision-making and practice. Moreover, the traditional practice of exchanging land provides informal institutional basis for land reallocation, promoting its implementation. Therefore, it is necessary to focus on the causes and processes of land reallocation. In the face of conflicts between people and land within the village, it is vital to fully comprehend the practical needs and rationality of land reallocation. The study results demonstrate the causes and processes of land reallocation and provide empirical evidence of land reallocation from the pilot areas, which offers a reference for comprehending the issue of rural land reallocation and the successful implementation of the second-round rural land contract extension.
丰雷 , 蒋妍 , 叶剑平 . 诱致性制度变迁还是强制性制度变迁?——中国农村土地调整的制度演进及地区差异研究 [J]. 经济研究 , 2013 ( 6 ): 4 - 18,57 .
Brandt L , Huang J , LI G , et al . Land rights in rural China: facts, fictions and issues [J]. The China Journal , 2002 , 47 : 67 ⁃ 97 .
Wang H , Tong J , SU F , et al . To reallocate or not: reconsidering the dilemma in China's agricultural land tenure policy [J]. Land Use Policy , 2011 , 28 ( 4 ): 805 ⁃ 814 .
Ma X , Heerink N , Van I E , et al . Land tenure security and land investments in Northwest China [J]. China Agricultural Economic Review , 2013 , 5 ( 2 ): 281 ⁃ 307 .
冀县卿 , 黄季焜 , 郜亮亮 . 中国现行的农地政策能有效抑制农地调整吗——基于全国村级数据的实证分析 [J]. 农业技术经济 , 2014 ( 10 ): 4 ⁃ 11 .
Rozelle S , Li G . Village leaders and land-rights formation in China [J]. American Economic Review , 1998 , 88 ( 2 ): 433 ⁃ 438 .
Kung J K S , Bai Y . Induced Institutional Change or Transaction Costs? The economic logic of land reallocations in Chinese agriculture [J]. Journal of Development Studies , 2011 , 47 ( 10 ): 1510 ⁃ 1528 .
Ho P . Institutions in transition: land ownership,property rights and social conflict in China [M]. Oxford : Oxford University Press , 2005 .
王亚华 . 对制度分析与发展(IAD)框架的再评估 [J]. 公共管理评论 , 2017 ( 1 ): 3 ⁃ 21 .
周立 , 奚云霄 , 马荟 , 等 . 资源匮乏型村庄如何发展新型集体经济?——基于公共治理说的陕西袁家村案例分析 [J]. 中国农村经济 , 2021 ( 1 ): 91 ⁃ 111 .
Ostrom E . Understanding institutional diversity [M]. Princeton : Princeton University Press , 2005 : 13 ⁃ 66 .
王亚华 . 公共事物治理概论 [M]. 北京 : 清华大学出版社 , 2022 .
Araral E . The strategic games that donors and bureaucrats play: an institutional rational choice analysis [J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 2008 , 19 ( 4 ): 853 ⁃ 871 .
Kung J K S . Common property rights and land reallocations in rural China: evidence from a village survey [J]. World Development , 2000 , 28 ( 4 ): 701 ⁃ 719 .
王荣宇 . 农村宅基地整理的自组织何以可能——基于公共池塘资源治理的视角 [J]. 中国土地科学 , 2022 , 36 ( 5 ): 102 ⁃ 111 .
Kung J K S . Choice of land tenure in China: the case of a county with quasi‐private property rights [J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change , 2002 , 50 ( 4 ): 793 ⁃ 817 .
Deininger K , Jin S . The impact of property rights on households' investment, risk coping, and policy preferences: evidence from China [J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change , 2003 , 51 ( 4 ), 851 ⁃ 882 .
Simon H A . A behavioral model of rational choice [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 1955 , 69 ( 1 ): 99 .
Simon H A . Rational choice and the structure of the environment [J]. Psychological Review , 1956 , 63 ( 2 ), 129 ⁃ 138 .
North D C . Institutions,institutional change and economic performance [M]. London : W. W. Norton & Company,Inc , 1990 .
冯淑怡 , 赖映圻 , 张兰 . 农地产权稳定性制度安排差异——基于能动的实用主义理论的新解释 [J]. 中国土地科学 , 2018 , 32 ( 9 ): 1 ⁃ 7 .
Liu S , Cater M R , Yao Y . Dimensions and diversity of property rights in rural China: Dilemmas on the road to further reform [J]. World Development , 1998 , 26 ( 10 ): 1789 ⁃ 1806 .
Jin S , Deininger K . Land rental markets in the process of structural transformation:productivity and equity impacts from China [J]. Journal of Comparative Economics , 2009 , 37 : 629 ⁃ 646 .
张红宇 , 刘玫 , 王晖 . 农村土地使用制度变迁:阶段性、多样性与政策调整 [J]. 农业经济问题 , 2002 ( 2 ): 12 ⁃ 20 .
Bowles S . Microeconomics:behavior,institutions and evolution [M]. Princeton : Princeton University Press , 2004 .
Johnson D G . “Property rights in rural China” mimeographed [M]. Chicago : University of Chicago , 1995 .
孔涛 , Unger J , 刘鹏凌 . 农村承包地调整的实证研究——通过村民小组数据的分析 [J]. 农业经济问题 , 2014 , 35 ( 11 ): 87 ⁃ 97 , 111 ⁃ 112 .
Olson M . The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups [M]. Cambridge MA : Harvard University Press , 1971 .
Blandon J , Henson S , Cranfield J . Small‐scale farmer participation in new agri‐food supply chains: Case of the supermarket supply chain for fruit and vegetables in Honduras [J]. Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association , 2009 , 21 ( 7 ), 971 ⁃ 984 .
Ostrom E . A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems [J]. Science , 2009 , 325 : 419 ⁃ 422 .
姚洋 . 集体决策下的诱导性制度变迁——中国农村地权稳定性演化的实证分析 [J]. 中国农村观察 , 2000 ( 2 ): 11 ⁃ 19,80 .
Kung J K S , Liu S Y . Farmers' preferences regarding ownership and land tenure in Post-Mao China: unexpected evidence from eight counties [J]. The China Journal , 1997 , 38 : 33 ⁃ 63 .
Atwood D A . Land registration in Africa: the impact on agricultural production [J]. World Development , 1990 , 18 ( 5 ): 659 ⁃ 671 .
Bromley D W . Formalizing property relations in the developing world:the wrong prescription for the wrong malady [J]. Land Use Policy , 2008 , 26 ( 1 ): 20 ⁃ 27 .
胡凌啸 , 曹丹丘 , 刘余 . 二轮延包下的土地调整问题:来自延包试点的启示 [J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版) , 2023 , 23 ( 2 ): 144 ⁃ 154 .
Alchian A . Some economics of property rights [J]. Politico , 1965 , 30 ( 4 ): 816 - 829 .
Unger J . The decollectivization of the Chinese countryside: a survey of twenty-eight villages [J]. Pacific Affairs , 1985 , 58 ( 4 ): 585 .
0
Views
3
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621