
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
兰州财经大学 甘肃金融协同创新中心,甘肃 兰州 730020
张宗军,研究方向:农业保险。
收稿日期:2021-10-08,
修回日期:2021-12-27,
纸质出版日期:2022-05-31
移动端阅览
张宗军,石响,令涛.中国化肥施用强度空间差异的影响因素及实证检验 [J]. 山西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,21(3):10⁃19.
ZHANG Zongjun,SHI Xiang,LING Tao.Influencing factors and empirical test of spatial variation of fertilizer application intensity in China [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University(Social Science Edition),2022,21(3):10⁃19.
张宗军,石响,令涛.中国化肥施用强度空间差异的影响因素及实证检验 [J]. 山西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,21(3):10⁃19. DOI: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-816X.2022.03.002.
ZHANG Zongjun,SHI Xiang,LING Tao.Influencing factors and empirical test of spatial variation of fertilizer application intensity in China [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University(Social Science Edition),2022,21(3):10⁃19. DOI: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-816X.2022.03.002.
化肥减量施用需要从宏观上掌握农户的决策逻辑。选择了12个能反映自然禀赋、投入要素和市场变化的指标,利用1999—2019年30个省级平衡面板数据进行了实证检验,并分北方和南方两大区域做了比较。结果表明:粮食种植面积占比、经营规模、可支配收入、经营性收入占比等因素的提升能有效推进化肥减量施用;但灌溉水平、机械化使用、财政支农、预期生产价格和教育年限等因素却显著刺激了化肥施用;主要宏观因素对两大区域化肥施用量的作用方向完全一致,但南方地区化肥减量施用的任务更加艰巨。为此,提出了实现化肥减施与收入保障有机统一的政策建议。
It is necessary to master farmers’ decision-making logic of chemical fertilizer application from a macro perspective. The article selects twelve variables and divides into three categories: endowment factor, input factor, and adjustment factor. Then it conducts empirical tests using balanced panel data of 30 provinces (cities, autonomous regions) from 1999 to 2019, and makes a comparison between the northern and southern regions. The results show that the proportion of grain cultivation, operation scale, disposable income and ratio of operating income significantly promote the reduction of fertilizer application.However, the irrigation level, mechanized use, expected production price, financial support and years of education significantly stimulate the increase of fertilizer application.The effect direction of the main macro factors on the amount of chemical fertilizer application in the two regions is completely consistent, and the task of reducing the amount of chemical fertilizer application in the south regions is more difficult and arduous.Therefore, some policy suggestions are put forward to realize the organic unification of environmental governance and income security.
Lamb R L . Fertilizer Use, Risk, and Off-Farm Labor Markets in the Semi-Arid Tropics of India [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 2011 , 85 ( 2 ): 359 ⁃ 371 .
Vandersypen K , Verbist B , Keita A C T , et al . Linking Performance and Collective Action—the Case of the Office du Niger Irrigation Scheme in Mali [J]. Water Resources Management , 2009 , 23 ( 1 ): 153 ⁃ 168 .
Purkait M K , Maiti A , Dasgupta S , et al . Removal of congo red using activated carbon and its regeneration .[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials , 2007 ,145( 1 ⁃ 2 ): 287 ⁃ 295 .
Brauw A D , Rozelle S . Migration and household investment in rural China [J]. China Economic Review , 2008 , 19 ( 2 ): 320 ⁃ 335 .
尚杰 , 尹晓宇 . 中国化肥面源污染现状及其减量化研究 [J]. 生态经济 , 2016 ( 5 ): 196 ⁃ 199 .
Nazarian M , Ajili A A , Akbari M , et al . Knowledge, attitude and environmental safety behaviors of vegetable growers in use of pesticides in south west of Iran .[J]. International Journal of Agronomy & Plant Production , 2013 , 4 ( 8 ): 1844 ⁃ 1854 .
Chikwendu L , Jenkwe E D , Eleazu E I , et al . Spatial Appraisal of Problems and Prospects of Fertilizer Use for Agriculture on the Environment in Mbieri, Mbaitoli Local Government Area, Imo State Nigeria [J]. Review of Environment and Earth Sciences , 2017 , 4 ( 2 ): 42 ⁃ 50 .
Stuart D , Denny R C H , Houser M , et al . Farmer selection of sources of information for nitrogen management in the US Midwest: Implications for environmental programs [J]. Land Use Policy the International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use , 2018 , 70 ( 1 ): 289 ⁃ 297 .
高晶晶 , 彭超 , 史清华 . 中国化肥高用量与小农户的施肥行为研究——基于1995—2016年全国农村固定观察点数据的发现 [J]. 管理世界 , 2019 ( 10 ): 120 ⁃ 132 .
Nkamleu G B , Adesina A A . Determinants of chemical input use in peri-urban lowland systems: bivariate probit analysis in Cameroon [J]. Agricultural Systems , 2000 , 63 ( 2 ): 111 ⁃ 121 .
Hunde D , Asfaw Z , Kelbessa E . Use and management of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants by indigenous people of 'Boosat', Welenchita area [J]. Ethiopian Journal of Biological Sciences , 2004 , 3 ( 2 ): 113 ⁃ 132 .
Hubbell B J , Marra M C , Carlson G A . Estimating the Demand for a New Technology: Bt Cotton and Insecticide Policies [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 2000 , 82 ( 1 ): 118 ⁃ 132 .
Jaraite J , KažukauskasAndrius . The effect of mandatory agro-environmental policy on farm environmental performance [J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics , 2012 , 63 ( 3 ): 139 ⁃ 146 .
Pandey Chitra , Diwan Hema . Integrated approach for managing fertilizer intensification linked environmental issues [J]. Management of Environmental Quality , 2018 , 29 ( 2 ): 324 ⁃ 347 .
仇焕广 , 栾昊 , 李瑾 , 等 . 风险规避对农户化肥过量施用行为的影响 [J]. 中国农村经济 , 2014 ( 3 ): 85 ⁃ 96 .
田云 , 张俊飚 , 何可 , 等 . 农户农业低碳生产行为及其影响因素分析——以化肥施用和农药使用为例 [J]. 中国农村观察 , 2015 ( 4 ): 61 ⁃ 70 .
Denkyirah E K , Okoffo E D , Adu D T , et al . Modeling Ghanaian cocoa farmers' decision to use pesticide and frequency of application: the case of Brong Ahafo Region [J]. Springerplus , 2016 , 5 ( 1 ): 1113 .
诸培新 , 苏敏 , 颜杰 . 转入农地经营规模及稳定性对农户化肥投入的影响——以江苏四县(市)水稻生产为例 [J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版) , 2017 ( 4 ): 85 ⁃ 94 .
纪龙 , 徐春春 , 李凤博 , 等 . 农地经营对水稻化肥减量投入的影响 [J]. 资源科学 , 2018 ( 12 ): 2401 ⁃ 2413 .
张露 , 罗必良 . 农业减量化:农户经营的规模逻辑及其证据 [J]. 中国农村经济 , 2020 ( 1 ): 81 ⁃ 99 .
黎孔清 , 马豆豆 . 生态脆弱区农户化肥减量投入行为及决策机制研究——以山西省4县421户农户为例 [J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版) , 2018 ( 5 ): 138 ⁃ 145 .
黄炎忠 , 罗小锋 . 化肥减量替代:农户的策略选择及影响因素 [J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版) , 2020 ( 1 ): 77 ⁃ 87 .
杜维娜 , 陈瑶 . 老龄化、社会资本与农户化肥减量施用行为 [J]. 中国农业资源与区划 , 2021 ( 3 ): 131 ⁃ 140 .
刘静 , 连煜阳 . 种植业结构调整对化肥施用量的影响 [J]. 农业环境科学学报 , 2019 ( 11 ): 2544 ⁃ 2552 .
0
浏览量
12
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621